![实用关节镜手术学](https://wfqqreader-1252317822.image.myqcloud.com/cover/89/917089/b_917089.jpg)
第三章 关节功能评价
第一节 肩关节功能评分
一、UCLA肩关节评分系统
UCLA评分系统
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00052001.jpg?sign=1738852527-nGF0FEcLWdPeoUbJcyxAXYPAUUekw7TA-0-90ab2be4926fe005b2df159e4ac4be57)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053001.jpg?sign=1738852527-PIQwtHoYuSUGZwsXxQ9LhJkqAFnTZpbA-0-b79b634e62eba15b95afc9151d48c44e)
注:1.UCLA即The university of California-Los Angeles的缩写。
2.肩关节评分系统总分为35分。优为34~35分;良为29~33分;差为<29分。
3.来源:Ellman H,Hanker G,Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff: End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1986,68:1136-1144.
二、Constant和Murley肩关节评分
Constant和Murley肩关节评分
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00053002.jpg?sign=1738852527-7Qi7DEeTa3GXB4xzK93GIj5we2z2jJj4-0-fd1d764327a4a4bcbbb22fd2419a69c1)
来源:Constant C R,Murley A H G. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop,1987,214:160-164.
三、美国肩肘外科评分
美国肩肘外科评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Scale)
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00054002.jpg?sign=1738852527-8SP19Vek8MiQiEAuC8lplO7jzMZaZ1k1-0-c1da9be8a1e7c886a879b6ede50bf03e)
来源:Richards R R,An K-N,Rigliani L U,et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1994,3:347-352.
四、Rowes评分系统
Rowes评分(Rowes Rating System for Bankart Repair)主要用于评价肩关节Bankart损伤手术后疗效评价,分值权重侧重于肩关节的稳定性。优为100~90分;良为89~75分;可为74~51分;差为50或50以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055001.jpg?sign=1738852527-uehNBnykJBBOE1ajRFtX5AyJ1wWUaMQF-0-5910a7063e8c9ed47f576df48b3292fa)
来源:Rowe CR,Patel D,Southmayd WW. The Bankart procedure:A long term end-result study. J Bone Joint Sury(Am).1978,60:1-16.
五、HSS肩关节评分系统
HSS(hospital for special surgery shoulder-rating score sheet)用于肩峰撞击综合征、肩峰成形术的疗效评价。比较注重对于疼痛的评定。优为90~100分;良为70~89分;可为50~69分;差为50分以下。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00055002.jpg?sign=1738852527-2gDgEYAi8fBlqnnabxsV22YIgetFYt1i-0-9d94e2e41af34d818c6db5259ffb6b68)
源自:Altcheck D W,Warren R F,Wickiewiez T L,et al. Arthroscopic acromioplasty. Technique and result. J Bone Joint Sury(Am),1990,72:1198-1207.
六、国人肩关节功能评分表
1.疼痛与夜间痛(20分)
带刻度VAS评分,两端表示极端情况,让患者自己划出疼痛状况。
(1)疼痛量表(10分)
(2)夜间痛量表(10分)
2.生活相关的功能活动(27分)
总计9条,能完成1条记为3分。
3.肌力和关节活动度(32分)
①肩部肌力(12分,双侧对比进行)
②肩关节活动度(20分)
4.医患满意度(21分)
医患双方分别在自己的VAS线上评出满意度,最后用满意度表盖上得出分数。
![](https://epubservercos.yuewen.com/04BA79/9313121104426801/epubprivate/OEBPS/Images/img00058001.jpg?sign=1738852527-MypZ3D3T46nBNWWke80hVy95ASDwXAXk-0-4d976651c68397922ca8c8f7177683a5)
(来自:复旦大学华山医院陈世益中国人肩关节功能评分系统的研究与制定)